A forum for jazz reviews, discussion of new jazz, blues music, the musicians, reviews of recent and historical releases, reviews of live performances, concerts, interviews and almost anything I find of interest.
by Ralph A. Miriello
Two Philadelphia musicians, separated by an almost generation of age, have nonetheless found themselves linked by a foundation in music that emerges, in part, from their shared Philly experience.
Guitar wizard Kevin Eubanks is a member of a jazz family that includes his two brothers, younger Duane a trumpeter, and elder brother Robin an established trombonist. Eubanks attended Berklee and has worked with drummer Art Blakey, saxophonist Sam Rivers, and bassist Dave Holland. The guitarist made his presence known more widely to the public when he became the musical director of the band of the Tonight Late Show and the subsequent Jay Leno Showfrom 1995-2010.
Orrin Evans attended Rutgers, worked with drummer Ralph Peterson, saxophonist Bobby Watson, soprano saxophonist Sam Newsome, and studied with master pianist Kenny Barron. He has made his mark with his work with the quartet TarBaby, his Grammy-nominated Captain Black Big Band, and increasing his exposure to a wider audience by replacing leaving pianist Ethan Iverson for a time with The Bad Plus.
These two created a dynamic duo for this album and titled it the Eubanks Evans Experience. The synergy here becomes apparent from the opening cut “Novice Bounce,” a Eubanks composition from his debut album Guitarist from 1983. This groove starts with some delicate guitar work and some precisely accompanied piano work that demonstrates just how in-tune these two can be. Like two joyously dancing fairies in an enchanted forest, there is a magical air to this one. The group morphs it into a more soulful endeavor with Evans' syncopated piano. Eubanks guitar increases the funk quotient without ever losing the sensitivity. His slithery guitar work shows a commanding articulation and an inherent flare that are impressive.
One of the most beautiful interpretations from the duo takes a soul/funk, some may say smooth jazz, hit from trumpeter Tom Browne from 1980 titled “Dreams of Loving You.” Eubanks and Evans reimagine this as a dreamy haunting ballad. Evans introduces this with a sensitive statement of the catchy and moving melody. Eubanks is the star here with his deft modulating guitar sound that emerges from Evans’ entry with an almost eerie Theremin-like sounding line that eeks with longing and pathos. This one is just beautiful.
The two break it up with a blues/funk-drenched collaboration “I Don’t Know” that raises the temperature of the proceedings up a couple of notches. Eubanks guitar is slippery and gut-busting and Evans’ piano takes on the feel of a barrel-house honk-tonk. The two get into it and play off each other’s ideas telepathically in a way that flows spontaneously.
“As They Ran Out of Biscuits” is a free-style collaboration that seems to be built by establishing a groove and then taking the improvisations to where they may go. This is probably the least structured and most adventurous of the set. This will not be everyone’s cup of tea but there is a real joy to absorb the active fluid collaboration going on here.
Orrin Evans composed the next ballad “Dawn Marie” for his wife. Eubanks opens the song with his own creative lead before the two enter this fetching melody. Evans plays beautifully here. There is obviously a deep connection with the loving sentiment that Evans intends to convey with this composition, and his touch and feel speak volumes. Eubanks is a master of using his electronics on his guitar to enhance his instrument’s effect. Here, his control is spookily modulated, perfectly aligning his sound to the mood intended.
The last two cuts of this album “Variations on the Battle” and Variations on Adoration” were both apparently recorded live at Chris’s Jazz Café in their hometown of Philadelphia. The two use two songs Evans’ “Half the Bottle” from his album #knowishalfthebattle of 2016 and Eubanks's “Adoration” from his album Zen Food from 2010 as the armatures upon which to improvise and expand. In the longer “Variations on the Battle” Eubanks exhibits a fusionist approach. His lines bloom in front of you as he gestates his ideas in an organic process that compliments over Evans' fertile backdrop. These two are brain-linked when playing so there is no hesitation, no awkward transitions they simply follow each other intuitively.
The shorter “Variations on Adoration” has a more melodic identity and Eubanks gently finger picks the entry as Evans creates lush pianistic lines. There is an exploratory feel to this composition as the two find a pulsating path to follow here, one that has a heartbeat of its own.
Eubanks Evans Experience is just that an experience; one that requires attention, one that requires awareness of nuance, and the ability to appreciate the true creative excellence of these two marvelous musicians. I will be looking forward to more from these two.
The clarinet is an instrument that harkens back to the early
days of Dixieland, later becoming a prominent vehicle of expression in the swing
era. Names like Barney Bigard, Sidney Bechet, Artie Shaw, Buddy DeFranco, Tommy
Dorsey, Woody Herman, Bob Wilber and the king of swing Benny Goodman all
brought the clarinet to the forefront of jazz in their respective eras. The
instrument saw a resurgence in the hands of innovators like Jimmy Giuffre, Eric
Dolphy, Ken Peplowski and Eddie Daniels in later years. These artists all have one thing in common, they are all men.
Today the preeminent practitioner of this wooden instrument
is a petite Israeli woman named Anat Cohen. Not only has Cohen almost single-handedly
resurrected an interest in this marvelously expressive instrument, she has shown
that in the right hands the clarinet can be both modern and versatile. With Cohen the clarinet can more than
hold its own as a dominant voice on the present-day jazz bandstand. Her remarkable virtuosity and creativity have been duly recognized with her two recent Grammy nominations.
The pianist Fred Hersch has been long considered one of the
most sensitive of players in jazz. He is said to play with a great romanticism, employing
a superb touch. His deep immersion into what he is playing is often manifested by his expressive physical movements while playing, showing the depth of his emotional connection to the music. The now sixty-two-year-old
Hersch has a storied history, having shared the stage with icons like Art Farmer,
Charlie Haden, Joe Henderson and Toots Thielemans to name just a few. He has
had working trios under his own name since 1985 and has been nominated twelve
times for a Grammy award for his work.
Fred Hersch and Anat Cohen (photo credit unknown)
It is a rare treat when you get a chance to hear two such
accomplished and nuanced musicians work together in a live setting. Hersch is no stranger to the duet format. In 1997 he recorded The Duo Album which featured a series of
duets with Jim Hall, Kenny Barron, Lee Konitz, Tom Harrell, Gary Burton, Tommy
Flanagan, Joe Lovano, Dianna Krall and Janis Siegel. But it is one thing to perform
a single song as a duet and a whole different endeavor to record an entire album with another artist and no supporting rhythm section. The communication
has got to be flawless and the intuition nearly telepathic. With Anat Cohen and Fred Hersch live in Healdsburg,
which was released March 9, 2018 on Anzic Records, the twoseemed to have accomplished this feat
in spades.
The album was superbly recorded by Steve Moon at the Raven
Performing Arts Theater in Healdsburg, CA on June 11, 2016. The music is simply
sublime. The compositions covered included Hersch’s “A Lark,” “ Child’s Song,”
and “Lee’s Dream,” Cohen’s “The Purple Piece,” and four classics, Strayhorn’s “Isfahan,” Ellington’s “Mood
Indigo,” Waller’s “ “Jitterbug Waltz,” and Jimmy Rowles “The Peacocks.” The
chemistry these two have is just combustible in a very positive way. Hersch is
generally the lead off batter in this ball game with Cohen adding her
considerable technique and aplomb in exquisite counterpoint.
On the opener “A Lark,” Hersch creates a, crystalline intro before
Cohen sails onto the scene like the songbird in flight floating on thermals.
The two have more than a conversation, their instruments embrace like two
dancers in perfect unison; two bodies merging into one, no longer separated by
space or time. The effect is quite moving, never a note out of place, never a
swerve or misstep.
The two repeat this empathetic embrace throughout the
program, dancing, swirling, playfully challenging each other, interchanging
ideas in the moment, using the melodies of the songs as mere armatures upon
which to spin magical interludes, to create unexpected conversations. Hersch’s
piano is delicate, melodic and gorgeous.Cohen’s clarinet is mellow, fluttering and warm-toned with moments of burnished
luster. The audience is quietly enraptured, reverential to the art, it’s
presence only made aware by a spontaneous eruption of applause at the end of
each selection.
My favorite selections include the aforementioned “A Lark,”
Cohen’s movingly played “The Purple Piece,” a jaunty rendition of Strayhorn’s “Isfahan”
which Cohen plays with marvelous tonal purity and a lingering vibrato.
I’m particularly fond of Jimmy Rowles” The Peacocks” which
maybe the tour de force of expression on this album. The two find the haunting
song a wellspring of inspiration. Hersch with his delicately dancing notes and
magically light touch and Cohen with her resonantly long lingering lines. She shows her prodigious technique slurring with
exquisite precision, hanging notes in the dense air like deliciously ripened
grapes off a vine. She exploits the hollow wooden timbre of her instrument to great
effect. The mood these two set is like
walking you through an enchanted forest.
Fats Waller “Jitterbug Waltz” is delightfully playful. Hersch
and Cohen obviously enjoy themselves reveling in the endless possibilities this spirited
song can elicit. The two tease you with a little minuet of notes finding inventive ways to reimagine the Waller melody.
The program ends with a slow moody rendering of Ellington’s “Mood
Indigo” with Cohen showing her most sensitive side, taking on the role that Barney
Bigard invented with Ellington.
Christian
Sands is a twenty-seven year old pianist who hails from New Haven, Connecticut.
His work with drummer Ulysses Owens Jr.
in Grammy Award winning bassist Christian McBride’s trio, has already garnered him wide spread
recognition. Together these three
musicians re-wrote what we came to expect from a piano jazz trio. A
sophisticated, extremely intuitive trio that brought a jois de vivre to
everything they played-from a re-imagining of a well-worn standard, to breathing
new life into an improvised version of a contemporary pop song. Although the trio was led and anchored by
McBride, Sands dazzled audiences with
his silky, polished facility and his locked-in sense of swing that manifested
itself in a myriad of styles that he commands.
The young
man has been attempting to play the piano since he was a toddler trying to
reach the keyboard, and started formal lessons at the age of four. Classically trained, he found himself all too
often distracted by his desire to improvise on the classics. He was directed by
a teacher to jazz studies, and eventually met Dr. Billy Taylor at a summer jazz
program at the University of Massachusetts in Amherst, who became a mentor and
took the young Sands under his wing.
Besides studying masters like Art Tatum, Teddy Wilson and Dr. Taylor,
Sands has also studied with two young lions of contemporary piano, Jason Moran
and Vijay Iyer and cites them all as inspirational.
Sands will
be playing for two nights, Friday and Saturday June 9 and 10th this
weekend at the Velvet Note in Alpharetta in support of his latest album Reach. Notes on Jazz caught up with Sands via
telephone Friday afternoon June 9, 2017.
NOJ: I
understand you have some ties to Atlanta can you speak to that for our hometown
fans?
CS: Yeah, it’s
my mother’s side of the family. My mother is originally from Augusta-
Waynesboro GA. All the family is down there, but I have a few cousins and a few
family members that have moved to Atlanta, so that is where the Atlanta connection
comes from.
NOJ: So
what do you think of the Atlanta music scene?
CS: It’s
great, I know a few musicians who come from here like (drummer) Terreon Gulley
and (vocalist) Avery Sunshine. I actually spoke to her yesterday on the phone.
We were going in opposite directions – she was going to the airport and I was
coming in from there. We were trying to link
up but couldn’t make it work. The music scene is awesome down here. Just
growing up and listening to hip-hop, Atlanta’s hip-hop scene is amazing; the
whole Georgia connection is incredible. Georgia is in the bloodstream of my
music and in me too.
NOJ: You
have been playing piano from the age of about four years old from what I have
read. Were you trained classically when you first took lessons?
CS: I started playing piano when I was about one
or two, I started lessons at four. It’s kind of difficult to find a teacher for
a four year old. I was originally classically trained, doing Suzuki piano,
playing Chopin and Mozart and that kind of repertoire. Then I went to jazz
studies when I was about seven years old.
NOJ: Did
any of the classical composers really ring true to you?
CS: Mozart.
Really because of the story of Mozart .I heard how young he was when he started.
I kind of identified with that because I was young at the same time. As a child
you think you can identify because you are both five or six or seven. That’s
the vibe, that’s what I was hearing myself as.
NOJ: Do you
still listen to classical music?
CS: Oh
yeah, all the time. I ‘am heavily into Scriban, but since college I have loved
Erik Satie. I absolutely love Satie, because of his use of simplicity and depth
at the same time. He has got this dark beauty in his writing. I love Ravel and Debussy
of course. You talk about colors and textures, the shaping of music, is absolutely
incredible. I am still a fan of Mozart, almost anytime I hear any Mozart or any of the
operas come on the radio, I am listening. I’m a big fan of Puccini as well.
NOJ: So how
did you change direction from classical to jazz?
CS: I
always liked to create. I liked to improvise, so when I was younger I would
take the songs that I was learning-Bach, Chopin or Mozart- and I would
improvise on the etudes, improvise on some of the patterns that they had. In
classical you’re not supposed to do that, so I would get in trouble all the
time. I would just take a solo and do one chorus and I would change the keys, my teacher finally got tired of telling me not to do that anymore, so she
ended up telling my parents to put me into jazz studies. So that’s when I
started those studies and I was seven.
NOJ: You
took lessons with Billy Taylor?
Dr. Billy Taylor
CS: Well
not just yet. I took lessons from Dr. Taylor at maybe fourteen years old. It
was absolutely incredible. I started out meeting him at the Jazz in July
Program at University of Massachusetts, Amherst. I actually teach there now,
this is my third year teaching at the program. It’s actually awesome to be
there. It’s a two week program and I was supposed to do just one week, but I
fell in love with the program and fell in love with Dr. Taylor. He liked my
playing and asked if I could stay the second week and so I did. Everywhere he
went I went.
NOJ: What
is the most influential thing Dr. Taylor did for you as a pianist?
CS: The
most influential thing that I can say Dr. Taylor talked about (with me) was
honesty in music. A lot of people don’t talk about that. He talked about why
people sound the way they sound. It wasn’t because they were trying to develop
concepts or something like that; it was because they were a product of their
environment. He talked about bringing the audience with you. Build your audience
to the point that they know exactly where you are going. If you want to play avant-garde, for example, build into that. He was a master of literally breaking down music. He would
tell you what’s going to happen in the form. He would tell you who is going to
solo here. He would tell you what kind of groove you were going to hear-(on a
composition) maybe from swing groove to Latin groove on the bridge. What is the
bridge? Well, the bridge is the middle section of the song. He would take the
time to explain all the parts before he would actually perform it.
NOJ: So if
I understand what you are saying, structure was essentially is what you took
away from his teaching?
CS: Yeah,
just the way to play music in an honest way.
NOJ:
Meaning what? Coming from your heart? Coming from your soul?
CS: Yrs
coming from your heart and coming from your soul, but just coming from where
you have come from. Coming from what you have experienced in your life.
NOJ: You
also took lessons from Jason Moran. Compare what you got from Jason as opposed
to what you got from Dr. Taylor.
CS: Jason
was amazing. My studies with him and Dr. Taylor overlapped for about a year.
Studying with both of them was so good for me because I learned so much about
the history of piano. Dr. Taylor was around when modern jazz piano was being
developed. He being a protégé of Art Tatum all the way to him being around to
see guys like Jason Moran, was just a tremendous breadth of experience. Jason
talked about pianists that a lot of other people didn’t talk about, like Paul
Bley, Herbie Nichols, Andrew Hill and Jaki Byard. Jaki and Andrew were both
Jason’s teacher so he came from that. What Jason taught me was the way to
create. Jason was all about creation, all about challenging my creativity. We
never worked on repertoire; it was always we worked on creativity.
NOJ: Can
you elaborate and explain how he would do that?
Jason Moran
CS: Jason
would have a two hour lesson and within that lesson we would just improvise and
play off each other. Maybe one goal would be to try not to repeat ourselves for
the entire session, or try to play the full two hours without stopping and see
how far we got. Continuously just moving in all directions, -almost like
water-pushing envelopes and pushing different ideas, trying to see how creative
we could be.
NOJ: Was
this exercise played within a song format or was it free?
CS: Not
necessarily, sometimes it would be or develop into a song. Sometimes it would
be free form; sometimes it would just be segments or just vamps or just
anything. That was the great thing about Jason, anything was game.Literally, it
could be playing inside the piano for two hours and seeing what kind of sounds
we could get out of it.
NOJ: So if
I can distill this a little bit for myself; Billy was structure and honesty and
Jason gave you freedom and creativity. Is that fair?
CS: Yeah
perfect.
NOJ: You also took lessons with Vijay Iyer, what
did he bring to the table for you?
CS: Vijay
was very similar to Jason, except Vijay was in a way very much structured like
Dr. Taylor. He would say creation was good, but it had to be purposeful. So he
would like to write something, for say the drums to specifically play. He was
more into through composing. It was the creativity with less manipulation of
the creativity within through composed pieces.
NOJ: Within Iyer’s format he still allows his trio
to improvise?
CS: Yes,
but a lot of it is based on things that are already written, which is
interesting. So the drum groove that Marcus Gilmore might play is written
there, but then within that he will make a variation of what is already
written. Vijay is all about textures as
well. When I mean textures, I mean, I compare his music to like (the game cube)
Tetris. You have the block and you can move its parts side to side and up and
down. His music is very sequential. He taught me how to take patterns and
textures in ways that it’s either the melody or the harmony or the rhythm. Each
piece had multiple functions. It works out because he is an engineer so it
makes perfect sense.
Kenya Revisited Bobby Sanabria's Manhattan School of Music Afro-Cuban Jazz Orchestra
NOJ: You
were on the Grammy nominated 2009 recording Kenya
Revisited Live when you were with Bobby Sanabria’s Manhattan School of
Music Jazz Band. This, by the way, was a great, great album. Tell us about that
experience.
CS: Bobby Sanabria is quite an individual. He is
an amazing person and an amazing band leader. The majority of the students in
the band were seniors or master’s students. That year myself, I think Jake
Goldbas the drummer was in that band, and there were a few other freshmen in that
band. The fact that he could take like five freshmen and the upperclassmen and
turn us into this machine, and what a machine; it’s incredible and even Bobby
said that was the best band he ever had. Then to be nominated for a Grammy was
absolutely an incredible experience. I got to learn more about Latin music. I grew
up playing it in New Haven and also Hartford CT. They are both big Latin
scenes. I grew up playing in different Latin ensembles like a Latin Jazz
Ensemble or a Brazilian Jazz Ensemble. The first Latin pianist I was introduced
to was Chucho Valdez and then Gonzalo Rubalcaba after that. There are so many
cats that can play that. I first got into Chucho and for me he was like a
combination of Oscar Peterson and McCoy Tyner. But he had this heavy, heavy
rhythmic feel. Both of them are heavy rhythmically and both are virtuosos. So
listening to that was incredible. My
senior year in high school I also started playing with Los Hombres Caliente out
of New Orleans with Bill Summers and Irvin Mayfield. They were heavily into
Latin influence, but also Creole music. That was the first band I ever went out
on tour with. Being a fan of Bill Summers from Herbie Hancock and the
Headhunters days, I was already hooked into that, and Irvin Mayfield just played
a pile of trumpet. That’s when I joined Bobby Sanabria, being in that band I
learned so much. One of the things I learned was how to play intensely. You
heard that band, how to play with so much force and a lot of passion, because
you hear Bobby just yelling and screaming. He would point and you and tell you
to solo, and you have no chord changes or nothing and you have got to play
something. Again creativity, but also just passion, and playing with fire. That’s
how I describe playing with Bobby, playing with fire.
NOJ: You played
with Christian McBride for several years in a remarkable trio (with drummer
Ulysses Owens Jr.) what did you personally get from that experience with
Christian?
CS: Similar
to Dr.Taylor, just the honesty of music, because with Christian his music is him.
Away from the stage he is this big personality with this big laugh and this big
smile and this loving personality, and that’s what his music is. His music
reflects that personality. So one of the things that I learned while I was with
him was just how to be yourself in music. How to truly be you, and how the music
should reflect you, because that is what he is all about. It should reflect
everyone (in the band), but it mostly reflects him. He probably learned that
from Freddie Hubbard, or all the people he has played with, because when you
listen to Freddie Hubbard it’s unapologetic, it’s in your face. One thing I
learned from McBride is how to be yourself in music and also I learned just how
to play for people, instead of musicians. He is such a virtuoso that he can
play anything.
NOJ: But he
is also a bit of a showman, right?
CS: Yeah he
is a bit of a showman, how to entertain people. When musicians come up to your
gig, they know what you’re doing already, but the people don’t. It’s all about
how you feel, how people feel. So we will play a Motown or Jackson Five tune or
like we recorded that Rolls Royce tune “Car Wash.” So I’ve learned not everyone
is a jazz lover or aficionado, but they are all music lovers. So play music, so
that is what I learned from him.
NOJ: That
gets us back to that Dr. Taylor statement about how do you try to bring your
audience along with you without compromising yourself and your own musical
integrity?
CS: Exactly.
NOJ: It is always an issue for club owners and
promoters of this music, who want to preserve the tradition and the legacy but
struggle with maintaining an audience. What was Dr. Taylor’s solution to this
problem of bringing your audience along with you?
CS: It’s funny,
because Dr. Taylor just loved all music. Because we would sit down and have
conversations about Mary Lou Williams and the next conversation would be about
the Roots or A Tribe Called Quest. He knew them, especially the Roots. They
recorded “I Wish I Knew How It Feels to be Free” with John Legend and I asked
him about that recording and he knew it and he told me he loved what they did
with it. His thing was that music is supposed to evolve. Music is supposed to
be a documentation of what life is (at any given time.) I have had a lot of conversations about where
jazz going is or what jazz is. Is hip hop jazz or should it be straight ahead,
or big band or traditional?I’m a product of both. For me jazz is supposed to evolve,
but you should evolve from the knowledge of where you have come from.
NOJ: I
understand what you’re saying and people like Nicholas Payton have their own
ideas about jazz and the word and what it all means, and if the word has any
relevance anymore.
CS: Yeah, I
totally understand where Payton is coming from too. I feel that jazz is still there
because that is where all the music comes from. So either you call it all jazz
or you don’t call it anything at all. So Nick is saying let’s not call it that
anymore.
NOJ: To me
jazz is like an umbrella. It takes in so much and maybe you don’t like the
word, or some kind of outdated connotation or where it came from, but it has
served its purpose. The music has widened its reach out all over the
world. I don’t know of any other music
that is so universally loved and even cherished in all parts of the world as
jazz. It has become so inclusive under the banner of “jazz,” that for us to
label the word as some kind of problem I don’t think is very helpful.
CS: I
understand what he is saying; there is just different ways of saying it. What
he is saying is that the word is bad. What I ‘am saying is take the word away,
the genre is like the root of all music today. It comes from the blues, it
comes from classical music, it comes from classical harmony, it comes from
African songs, it comes from field songs from slavery, and it comes from early
French music which had a swing to it. It’s actually very interesting, other
music was relatively straight and then French music had a bounce to it. When you hear older musicians play jazz or you
listen to older recordings, even the blues records like Blind Willie Johnson or
you listen to these early classical recordings it’s all related. But jazz is a
direct mirror from American history. Today it sounds the way it sounds because
it has absorbed so many different parts, views and conditions of the American
experience. It’s so broad because America is so broad culturally. That’s why it
sounds like it does. So either you call it jazz or call it all jazz or you
don’t call it jazz and instead don’t name it anything. Somebody once said if
everything is art there is no art. So if everything is jazz then there is no
jazz. It’s kind of like the way you want to take it. Nick is kind of saying
don’t call it jazz call it Black American Music or Black African music because
it is, and it is that, but it is also a lot of other things .
NOJ: You
have played with McBride and Thomas Fonnesbaek and Ben Williams all different
bass players. How does playing with these different bassists differ for you as
a pianist?
CS: It’s
funny because if I wasn’t a pianist I would either be a trumpet player or a
bass player. I love melody and I love how trumpet and bass can manipulate
melody, it’s very much the closest thing to the voice that you have.
NOJ: The trumpet definitely is like a voice, I
don’t know about the bass?
CS: The
bass is like a voice because you can bend notes and manipulate notes like a voice.
So that’s how I viewed it like that. I love the bass and I grew up playing with
a lot of bassists. I grew up playing with Nat Reeves and Rufus Reid, Phil
Bowler, Jeff Fuller. I definitely played with Jeff every day. Christian
McBride, Thomas Fonnesbaek, Ben Williams, John Clayton, and Derrick Hodge the
list goes on and on.
NOJ: I’ve
noticed that you have played several children’s songs in your repertoire. You’ve
played “Pure Imagination” from Willie
Wonkaand the Chocolate Factory;
you’ve played “If Your Happy and You Know It” another children’s song and now
on your latest album you do “Somewhere Out There” from the animated feature An American Tail. What is it about these
happy children’s songs that give you so much inspiration?
CS: That’s
because that is what gave me inspiration as a child and gave me inspiration to
play. I know I am not the only one who has had inspiration from these songs,
because this is a memory from my childhood and who I am today. These movies
were part of my experience and a part of my generation too. To play them is
also reaching to audience members and to people who have gone through that
experience as well. I can talk to
somebody about Willie Wonka and say “I said good day sir” and people can
remember that scene and identify with it.
Or I can talk about Fievel from An
American Tail and people who know that movie can relate .Many peoples
childhood or many people who have children can all relate, so it’s part of the
American culture and American life.
NOJ: The
three times I’ve seen you perform; you have always dressed very nattily, always
in suit and a tie. How did this fascination with clothes come about and how
does the way you dress affect the way you play?
CS: The dressing is Sand’s men thing. My
grandfather dressed up, my father dressed up, my brother dresses up, my uncles.
So, all the Sand’s men were pretty dapper. I guess it is a family thing. I
don’t always wear a suit sometimes I just wear a tee shirt, but the majority of
the time I wear something nice anyway. It’s kind of empowering in a way. To
dress up and have, not a uniform, but something that sets you apart from the
listener that is coming to see you. At the same time I also dress up, on an
African American side of it, because I want to show African American boys that
you don’t have to just have baggy pants to be a rapper. You could totally wear
a suit and still convey a message. So it’s a message thing too.
NOJ: How
does it affect the way you play?
CS: Well it
used to affect the way I played. When I wore a suit I tried to play more
elegantly, as opposed to when I wear something less dressy when I play more
rugged and raw, but now I just play.
NOJ: You dedicated two of the songs on your latest
album to pianists. One to Chick Corea called “Armando’s Song” and one to Bud
Powell’s called “Bud’s Tune.” Tell us
about those influences and why you wanted to do this?
CS: I
listened to Chick as a kid, but not intently, because I grew up listening to
Fats Waller and Ahmad Jamal and a lot of Herbie (Hancock), but I didn’t really
listen to Chick as a kid intently. Later as an adult I really started
listen to him and kind of understanding what he was doing. I listened to him with
the Latin piano, because he has articulation with his rhythm .Later on, I
really got into listening to pianists and trying to figure what they did that
made them who they were. Then with Chick it was more about his compositions.
Where he came from, the way he articulated and where the Spanish thing came
from. McBride started working with Chick, and there was a lot of Chick material
and we would actually practice some Chick tunes for sound check or play some on
the bandstand. Then I got a chance to meet him, and he was such a nice and
gracious guy. So I just wanted to write a tune. I was really listening to him a
lot at the time, trying to understand what he was doing compositionally.
NOJ: But
you don’t feel he is an influence on you?
CS He is, but he’s not. He is, because I love the way he plays in time. He has a similar
way, as do a lot of Latin players, of playing very structured, but then
loosening it. It is almost like breathing. The way Chick plays, he will play
very much on the beat and then he will play these phrases and then go back to
the beat and then he will leave some space. It’s very, very incredible. I would
say he is definitely an influence, but a later influence.
NOJ: What
about Bud Powell?
CS: If you go to Chick you got to go to Bud and
McCoy. He was another guy that I got into later on, because I grew up listening
to Monk. Monk was the guys for me, the end all, be all. Thelonious Monk.
NOJ: That’s
funny because he was a great composer, but some say not a greatest pianist.
CS: Right, but something about his compositions
made him the greatest pianist on his music. Monk had this wittiness, he was
just funny. Listening to Bud was similar, but Bud was faster. Bud was a little more
stylistic, more suave.
NOJ: Well
Bud came directly from the (Art) Tatum school, right?
CS:
Exactly, right they both did. They were different translations of Tatum. Dr.
Taylor would tell the story of Monk listening to Tatum and Monk actually
sounded like Tatum at one point. So
someone would tell Monk, we already have a Tatum so you have to do your own
thing. The Monkism was already there in his playing, but like when you hear some
of his flurries that‘s a Tatum line. “Round Midnight” was written after an
arrangement that Tatum played of “Body and Soul," it was inspired by that.
When you hear that version you can understand where it came from. Monk had the
harmony thing and Bud had the linear ideas. So if you take Bud, he has all
these little slips and they change keys and dexterity. So Bud was another
influence on me as to how to play time, how to play up-tempo, but also how to
play in different pockets.
NOJ: You haven’t mentioned Bill Evans. How, if
at all did Evans playing influence you?
CS: Bill
Evans just because of his clarity. Each note was just ringing. When he played he was so
clear and so patient and he was an honest player. I heard him on some
interviews telling people how he was still working on things and you’re saying
to yourself how is that possible that you (Bill Evans) are still working, what are you
working on, it’s so beautiful.
NOJ: Many
people consider Bill to be one of the most honest, sincere players who ever
played. He bore his soul every time he sat at that keyboard. It was like he was
playing with no clothes on; he left himself out there naked to the world.
CS: That’s
really what I liked about his playing. Honesty and he has patience about his
playing that I really like.
NOJ: What
living artist would you most like to play with if you had a chance?
CS: Wayne
Shorter. That’s the guy for me it’s Wayne.
NOJ: Well
Wayne is one of the best jazz composers in the last fifty years, for sure.
CS: I don’t even feel like he is playing jazz
anymore. It’s hard to describe. I don’t even think he is playing music anymore,
it is just got its own identity now. Its expressions and gestures; it’s coming
from a different place. It’s not coming from this scale or this sound there, it
is coming from how he breathes into the horn and whatever comes out, comes out.
It is just him. You talk about honest music, it’s just Wayne. It sounds like
science fiction.
NOJ: If you
had to choose one pianist that most represents where you want to be
stylistically who would that be?
CS: That’s
hard, but probably Jason Moran or Chucho Valdes. I’d say Jason, because
creatively he is in a place by himself. He is creating his own palette, sort of
like Cecil Taylor did. When I was
studying with Jason he would send in incredible subs like Fred Hersch, Ethan
Iverson, Mathew Shipp and Gonzalo Rubalcaba so you got it all. That expressionism
that Jason and Cecil and Mathew have makes sense if you understand where they
are coming from. They have created their own scales, and the scales are not
derived from one note, it can be a chord, but to them it's like one note. It’s
strange and different and it’s totally their own.
Jason is
coming more of a fine artist perspective, where his music is coming from
skateboarders or paintings or words and voices and installations and multi-media
presentations. I love that and I want to do more of that. At the same time I
also want to represent America and where I am from like Chucho is doing with
Cuban Music. So that’s why I say Chucho. He has this staple of what Cuban music
is all about, but he also has a very specific style and sound. He is very
much the ambassador of Cuban music, just like Danilo Perez is the representative
of Panamanian music. They represent all the good and all the musicality and all
the studying and the history of their music. So eventually, I want to do that as
well, like Chucho is doing and at the same time continue to push it forward.
Chucho Valdes
NOJ: What
is your go-to song, when you have the crowd in the palm of your hand, and at
the end of the night all you want to leave them with is something really special
that you can dig into?
CS: Recently it actually been “L.O.V.E.” the Nat
King Cole kind of thing. Everybody understands love or some form of it and
right now that’s the go-to song for me. We can kind of go anywhere with it and
people can understand the concept of it.
NOJ: What
contemporary musicians are doing the most interesting music and what is it that
grabs you about what they are doing?
CS:
Nicholas Payton and Christian Scott because they have taken what Miles did and
are pushing it into different boundaries. I’m a big Miles fan. I think Miles would have still been doing this
had he still been here, but somebody has to do it so those two guys. Kendrick
Lamar, because as far as words go, as far as rhythms go, he is totally doing
something that musicians in general are not doing. He brought the idea of theater back to the
music. Things have prologues and transitional sections in his music, so he is
really doing something different. Chance
the rapper. What I like about him, he is so honest with his music, and he is
always sounding like he is just having a ball; so much fun. He is coming from Gospel music and jazz and he
is putting it all into his music. Sometimes it doesn’t all work out, but you
kind of appreciate the attempt. Wayne
Shorter is still doing it. He is beyond music. My brother and I are big Star
War fans and Wayne is our Yoda. He just exists and tells us things in riddles
and we just have to figure out what they mean. Wayne is incredible
compositionally and as a playing artist he is just amazing.
NOJ: You
play some of the Great American Songbook. Do you believe it has run its course?
CS: No. I don’t think it has run its course, but
now it is giving us different ways to think about music for today. I think now,
instead of playing them verbatim, they have information about how to put song
form together or how to form melodies that really speak to people, because
those songs did and they still do. People still relate. So there is something
there even though it was written so many years ago.
NOJ: The
songbook has amazing durability, but if you could just take the last fifty
years, because many of these songs are beyond fifty years old, who would you
say are contemporary composers that have created songs that will transcend
their period and have the lasting endurance that the American Songbook has had?
CS: Wayne (Shorter), Miles Davis but he played
a lot of Wayne’s music.
NOJ: I’m
thinking along the lines of more popular music, because jazz often takes
popular songs and re-imagines them for their purpose.
CS: That’s
a tough question. We live in a time when music is constantly changes, but what
is lasting.
NOJ: Well I
will give you a few that I think do make it to this level of durability and see
whether you agree? Stevie Wonder.
CS: Oh
totally yes. Stevie Wonder, Michael Jackson, probably him more than Prince.
Eric Clapton, a lot of his music is blues, but his words and the story he tells.
I would have to say Sting.
NOJ: I’m
not sure about Clapton but Sting I would agree with you on. I think Paul Simon
is enduring and of course Lennon and McCartney. But what about people like
Antonio Carlos Jobim?
CS: Jobim’s
writing is beautiful and gorgeous, but I think his music has sort of finally,
not run its course, but is fading into the background now. It’s a shame because
I think his music is absolutely beautiful, it’s given us the tools, like the
American songbook, to build off of. But anytime you hear the song the “Girl
form Ipanema “everyone knows the song even if they don’t know it is a Jobim
song. So, yes you could put him in there.
NOJ: Some
other people that you might consider as durable song composers are Carole
King’s work or Bob Dylan’s work.
CS: Well
yeah and then I would have to say Bob Marley’s work. You talk about love, I’d
have to say anytime you talk about love and the betterment of the human
condition than that is what stands the test of time. Like Stevie Wonder or Bob
Marley or Bob Dylan or Joni Mitchell they are talking about all of us together.
NOJ: Tell
us about your new album and your upcoming tour and your gig at the Velvet Note.
CS: The new
album is called Reach and it’s about
reaching out and self discovery; not only for these artists but for the
listener. Finding out who you are or
understanding who you have been. So that’s what the whole album is about. I
wanted to write music reflecting that search, those questions that I have had
and some of the answers that I found. A majority of the compositions are music that
I have written for this session and some I wrote way before the session, years ago.
The standards that I did include the Bill Wither’s “Use Me” and the song “Somewhere
Out There” from An American Tail are songs
from my childhood that I have identified with, and I play them for me, but also for
people who want to hear something they can relate to, that they remember or that
they know. The record is really just a feel good record, it is for people and that
is who I dedicate it to.
NOJ: You will
be playing tonight Friday June 9th and Saturday June 10th at the Velvet
Note in Alpharetta. Who will be playing with you in the band?
CS: At the Velvet
Note, Barry Stevenson will be on bass and my younger brother Ryan Sands on the drums.
This past Saturday the quartet of the fine pianist Kevin
Bales entertained the patrons of the Mason Tavern in North Decatur. The Tavern
has been revitalized with the addition of partner Sam Yi, of Churchill Grounds
fame, and his inclusion of Thursday night jazz sessions since December 8, 2016.
The formula has worked so well that Sam recently expanded the music to include Saturday
night shows.
Yi has been a fixture on the Atlanta jazz scene as the
proprietor of the venerable jazz club “Churchill Grounds.” The club was forced to close last July after a
twenty-year run. In search of an
alternate venue, Sam was able to institute pop-up jazz events at the Mason Tavern,
a local North Decatur eatery on Clairmont Road, and to date some
extraordinary jazz has been played at this welcoming venue.
The venue has featured a stable of local and nationally
recognized talent with names like Louis Heriveaux, Russell Gunn, Dave Potter,
Craig Shaw, Darren English, Terrence and Deshawn Harper, Marlon Patton, Gary Motley
and Chris Burroughs appearing on multiple occasions. It has also seen the likes of Jason Marsalis,
Carl Allen, Rodney Witaker, Theodross Avery and Russell Malone all sitting-in
at the Tavern.
Kevin Bales and Sam Yi at Mason Tavern
On this evening, the renowned pianist Kevin Bales brought
together a cooking ensemble, with Kevin Smith on upright bass, Robert Boone on
drums and E.J. Hughes on saxophones. Bales is one of the Southwest’s busiest on-call
jazz keyboard artists. A graduate from the University of North Florida music
program, he has toured and recorded with iconic saxophonist Bunky Green, guitarist
Nathen Page, trumpeter Marcus Printip, and Grammy nominated vocalist Rene Marie
to name a few. His journeyman work as a sideman always adds a touch of
inventiveness and energy to any artist he supports. He is a busy educator who
offers individual and group lessons through his music company, Kevin Bales
Music.
Robert Boone, dr; EJ Hughes,saxs; Kevin Smith, b; Kevin Bales, keys
After a brief introduction by Mr. Yi, the evening started
out with Bales and company playing an Ellis Marsalis composition that I was
unfamiliar with,” Swingin’ at the Haven.” The group took this easy swinger immediately
into high gear with Bales pushing the pace and Boone and Smith responding in
kind. E.J. Hughes played a sedate but tasteful soprano saxophone solo. The animated
pianist soloed on his electronic keyboard with abandon. He bounced on his small stool , jostling his
keyboard with a joyous elan that shook the stand to the point of precariousness.
His fleet right hand blurred the separation between notes with speed and
agility.
The set continued with the classic “Time After Time,” a song
originally penned for the film It
happened in Brooklyn. Hughes on tenor this time using a vibrato-less,
soulful tone that had no pretense or flash. Bassist Smith produced nice, plump
walking bass notes over which Bales played a particularly bluesy piano solo.
The quartet proceeded with the traditional New Orleans standard
“House of the Rising Sun,’ popularized by Eric Burden and the Animals in 1964.
Under Bales direction the group took a deep, down and dirty approach to this
blues classic. Bassist Smith showed off his arco abilities by bowing a soulful passage.
Saxophonist Hughes also elicited some mournful notes on his sparse tenor.
Drummer Boone tastefully kept the pace as Bales, a master of dynamics, led his group up through a crescendo of
tension ultimately easing the music back down to a skillful release.
“If I Were a Bell,” a song penned for the 1955 musical Guys and Dolls and made famous by Miles
Davis rendition on his 1956 album Relaxin”
with the Miles Davis Quintet, was next on the playlist. The group played this with tremendously
intuitive interplay, Boone being especially attentive to Bales musical
suggestions along the way. Smith knowing precisely where to place purposeful
bass line for maximum effect. This was surprising as Bales admitted to having
not discussed the playlist with his rhythm section prior to the gig.
The group ended the first set with the title track from the
1990 Spike Lee movie of the same name “Mo Better Blues.” Bales switched the
tone of his electronic keyboard to sound like an organ. The tone was perfect
for the gospel inspired composition that had the band cooking, with Bales
directing the up and down of the pace at will. Bales is an incredibly facile
player who seems to have an inner wellspring from which percolates creativity and
expansion in his playing. His ebullient personae is infectious spurring on his
bandmates and assuring his audiences a night of musical adventure and steamy delight. You can listen here: https://play.spotify.com/artist/6rtoiKVyvoRkGROcRQ2bkr
The definition of zenith is “the highest point reached in
the sky by any celestial object.” Over
the years I have always enjoyed Mr. Copland's work. I identify deeply with his musical sensibilities. The pianist has consistently tried to reach his own personal
musical zenith, whether it be as a leader or as a much sought after sideman. With his latest recording Zenith
he may have accomplished just that.
From the opening bars of "Sun at Zenith” you are transported into a world of thoughtful rumination. Mr.
Copland has a wonderfully sensitive touch on his keyboard and here he is joined
by his working trio of equally emotive musicians, his long tenured associate Drew Gress on acoustic bass
and his frequent collaborator Joey Baron on drums. The trio finds another partner in this evocative music
making journey in the form of the trumpeter Ralph Alessi, a musician whose subtle brilliance shines beautifully on this recording. Together these gentlemen
make magic happen.
All compositions, except "Mystery Song" and "Air We've Never Breathed," are by Mr. Copland whose style has a
floating, weightless feel to it, the perfect platform to allow Mr. Alessi’s delicate
trumpet work to soar in the open, both within the band’s elastic rhythms and
above them. “Sun at the Zenith “is a testament to the group's one speak-four
musicians melding their distinct sounds into one cogent and unified statement
of beauty.
Listen to the pliant bass work of Gress on the opening of “Mystery
Song,” a Duke Ellington composition hardly recognizable under Copland’s modern arrangement, specifically tailored to be a
true collaborative effort for these particular musicians. Mr. Baron’s syncopated drum work is the epitome of
subtle force and probing drive. Copland’s piano is rhythmically elegant as it
weaves lines of unexpected beauty over the composition’s core rhythmic drive.
The effect is intoxicating in the way the group just pulls you along into its
sway.
Marc Copeland photo credit unknown
Alessi is a unique voice on the trumpet, a voice that sings
in an almost angelic way. Even when he reaches to the outer limits of the
trumpet’s higher register it is restrained and purposeful with no tendency
toward brashness.
The “Air We’ve Never Breathed” is a three-part suite that is
like a series of tonal conversations that was created by Mr. Copland along with his other band mates. The first features an interchange betweenGress’ plucky bass and Alessi’s muted
trumpet, subtitled “The Bass Knows.” This proceeds to Copland stirringly creating
a series of repeated motifs on piano titled “Up and Over.” Gress and Baron
percolate in their own rhythmic soup over which Copland and Alessi have their
own distinct conversation. The music vacillates between subdued and animated with
each musician lending their individual talents in a show of unified purpose. Baron
suddenly transforms the music with a stunning display of precision cymbal work on
the final piece titled “Lips.” The relentless cymbal time used as a background
for a gorgeous interplay between Copland’s melancholic piano and Alessi’s
sorrowful trumpet.
“Waterfalls” is a wonderful vehicle for the pulsating bass
work of Gress. No other bass player, with the exception of Christian McBride,
sounds quite as robust at keeping such difficult and complex time with unerring
consistency as Drew Gress. Anchored by his frenetic heartbeat, the group veers
into a driving cascade of sound that finds Alessi at his most intense, pulled
along by the gentle prodding of Copland, the unassuming director of the whole
production. Baron splashes into the current with his liquid-like cymbal work.
The more traditional “Best Bet” is a composition that
features Copland at his most lyrical. The gentle, breezy feel is accentuated
by Alessi’s solo work that takes to the air like a bird in flight. Copland’s
dancing elegance creates an air of calm beauty that is reminiscent of some of Bill Evan’s ruminative ballad work. His cascading arpeggios fall lightly like lingering
raindrops falling on a thirsty leaf. Alessi’s poignantly squeezed notes perfectly
counterbalance Copland’s tender sound.
The last cut on this fine album, titled “Hurricane,” has a
circular feel to it with Copland’s repeating lines and Gress’ big round bass
pulsating throughout. Baron’s
rambunctious drums create the whirlwind background as Alessi’s horn hovers like
a scream in the wind. Copland’s piano is at its most percussive with the
bombastic Baron filling in between the notes with relentless cymbal crashes,
tumultuous toms and pops on his snare. A hurricane of sound that leave the
listener anxiously waiting for the impending calm.
Zenith is an initial release from Mr. Copland's recently formed label, Inner Voice Jazz. If this first recording is any indication of what is to come, this label will be a sure source for superbly creative recordings in the future.
Here is a video of some of Mr. Copland's previous work:
With the recent passing of the pianist Paul Bley, I was intrigued by the many tributes posted on line and in newspapers for this very iconoclastic player who I thought had limited appeal. I had been aware of Bley and have a sampling of his music -both as a sideman and a leader- in my music collection. But to be honest, I never quite got what all the fuss was about? Maybe it is sad or maybe it is fortuitous, but obituraries have a way of leading me to search more closely into a person's life and work.
I dug up a Ben Ratliff interview with the guitarist Pat Metheny from the New York Times in 2005. Metheny recalled how a solo that Mr Bley did in 1963 with Sonny Rollins influenced him greatly. He called the solo "the shot heard 'round the world," That was a pretty strong sentiment from a very gifted guitarist who I respect. I would have never guessed Metheny had such a musical linkage to the pianist Bley. ( You can check out this interview here)
"...the shot heard 'round the world."
Pat Metheny Brief Bio:
I had to study up on this man's life. (Hyman) Paul Bley was a Canadian born in Montreal, Quebec on November 12, 1932. His surname was taken from his adopted father, a Jewish textile merchant who owned an embroidery factory. In the mid to late forties Bley attended McGill Conservatory often playing around Montreal with his trio. For a short time, at the age of seventeen, he replaced Oscar Peterson at the Alberta Lounge. He enrolled in the Juilliard School of Music in New York in 1950 remaining active in the Montreal music scene. In 1952 Bley and other local musicians established the Jazz Workshop, a jazz series held Saturday afternoons at Chez Paree, a leading Montreal nightclub.
According to Chuck Haddix's biography of Charlie Parker- Bird the Life and Music of Charlie Parker -one day,unannounced, Bley decided to show up on Parker's doorstep in NYC. He brazenly invited the saxophone legend to play at the Canadian Jazz Workshop. Surprisingly Parker readily accepted! The young entrepreneurial producer was relieved when the notoriously unreliable Parker actually showed up to play, both at a live Canadian Broadcasting television show and later with Bley's trio at the Jazz Workshop. Jazz in Canada was at its peak at this time.Parker later that year made his famous Massey Hall recording in Toronto with his "Quintet of the Year" that included Bud Powell on piano, Charles Mingus on bass, Dizzy Gillespie on trumpet and Max Roach on drums. A crackdown on local clubs in Montreal, forced many local musicians to leave for greener pastures. Itching to play with the innovators of this new music, Bley found himself accompanying jazz giants like Lester Young, Ben Webster, Chet Baker and Sonny Rollins. The restless twenty-one year old eventually went to California and met bassist Charles Mingus. Mingus asked the pianist to conduct his Nonet on a recording for Mingus's new record label Debut in 1953. That same year Bley released his own first recording on the Debut label- Introducing Paul Bley with Mingus on bass and Art Blakey on drums.
Bley moved to California taking a residency at the Hillcrest Club in Los Angeles. He booked Ornette Coleman's group to the Club in 1958. The iconic "live" performance captured on the recording The Fabulous Paul Bley Quintet finds a young Coleman on alto with Don Cherry on trumpet, Charlie Haden on bass, Billy Higgins on drums and Bley on piano, playing music that would usher in an era of the Shape of Jazz to Come and launch the avant-garde school of jazz.
Bley married his first wife, the pianist and composer Carla Bley in 1957 encouraging her to write music. Her compositions would influence him throughout his career. In 1960 Bley took another turn into free jazz joining the adventurous reed player Jimmy Giuffre, who had just broken up his trio with guitarist Jim Hall. The new Jimmy Giuffre 3 recorded their first of four albums Fusion ,with Giuffre on clarinet and Steve Swallow on bass and Bley on piano. This iteration would last for three years.
In 1963 Bley was a featured sideman in the aforementioned RCA recording of Sonny Rollins with Coleman Hawkins Sonny Meets Hawk. This was a launching point for Bley's career as a leader. In the late sixties Bley was a pioneer performer in the use of electronics. He and his then wife composer /vocalist Annette Peacock performed experimental music using early Moog synthesizers. Bley formed the electric jazz fusion group Scorpio in 1974. It was during this period that he recorded the album unofficially titled Jaco featuring then relative unknowns Pat Metheny on guitar, Jaco Pastorius on bass with Bruce Ditmas on drums. By the end of 1974 Bley's love affair with electronic instrumentation began to fade.
In the nineteen seventies through the nineteen eighties Bley was involved with Carol Goss (whom he married in 1980) creating IAI ( Improvising Artist Inc)- a company that developed a catalog of progressive music and promoted live performances of avant-garde artists. During this period, Bley performed works on solo piano and also recorded and performed with trio mates bassists Steve Swallow and Gary Peacock and drummer Barry Altschul. In the 1990's the pianist became part of the faculty at the New England Conservatory of Music. Bley was inducted into the Order of Canada in 2008. Mr. Bley passed of natural cause on January 3, 2016 at his home in Stuart, Florida.
Now that I had a better understanding of the man and his career I decided to listen to Bley's music with a more deliberate intent. I found a feature on jazz.com where the contemporary pianist Aaron Parks was asked to name his twelve favorite Paul Bley recordings (you can check out this article here). Parks cited multiple songs with several memorable solos. I listened intently to every one I could get my hands on. Not surprisingly-Bley's solo on "All the Things You Are" from the 1963 RCA album Sonny Meets Hawk with Sonny Rollins, Coleman Hawkins, Paul Bley, Bob Cranshaw and Roy McCurdy- was again praised as a benchmark performance.
The Search:
Convinced there must be something there, I listened to this solo over and over and over again trying to grasp the nuances of its apparent evolutionary impact. Frankly, while I thought it was well done, I was still a bit perplexed as to its hallowed significance. The solo was a bit jagged, a little discordant and strayed a bit too far off the changes to my ears. I was at a loss. I must be missing something. How could I better understand the depth of this solo that influenced so many people?
At the risk of showing my ignorance, I decided to ask the professionals- other pianists that I respect who would be better able to explain the significance. I would pose a question and include a YouTube video of the performance for their convenience. I was excited by the prospect of seeing who would respond and what they would say.
Here is the question I posted to over a dozen pianists :
"With the recent death of pianist Paul Bley I was wondering whether you could shed some light on his playing for me. The NY Times did an interview with guitarist Pat Metheny who lauded Bley's solo on "All the Things You Are" on the Sonny Meets Hawk album from 1963. I have included a YouTube video of the song with Bley's solo starting at approximately 3:15.I would be interested in what your take is on this solo, what makes it so special (if you agree with Pat) and Bley's work in general."
The musicians are from a cross section of respected pianists and educators, many who I have written about. Some understandably declined, feeling they were not familiar enough with Mr. Bley's music to comment.
Surprisingly one fine player, who begged anonymity, claimed he couldn't stand to listen to Bley's music, characterizing the solo with these words: "Everything is poorly handled, out of proportion with all jazz pianistic elements... ." I was starting to think maybe I wasn't so far off, but soon it became evident his comments were clearly in the minority.
Most responses were thoughtful and laudatory. I am grateful for their studied responses, for their willingness to participate and for their generosity in trying to help me, and perhaps some of you, better understand the impact of this solo and the important and lasting influence of Mr. Bley and his music.
Several pianists suggested the answer lie in a quote from Paul himself found on the liner notes to his album from 1963, the same year as the aforementioned Sonny Meets Hawk ( RCA)- Paul Bley with Gary Peacock (ECM).
"Chord changes had never interfered with my own way of hearing melody. Whether playing standards with steady time and a given set of chord sequences or free rhythm and free harmony pieces where the only guide to the improviser is the vivid character of the given written composition, one's own personality should be apparent to the listener"
"What I love about the "All The Things You Are" solo of Paul Bley is that Paul always focuses on developing a motive. He finds or introduces and follows and varies this motive until he introduces the next motive vs just trying to play lines that express the relationship of the chord progression.
He focuses on these motives but follows the principle of tension and release with his focus on melodic motives rather than just playing lines. Paul has an intuitive way to follow melodies and develop them in a similar way as for example J.S Bach develops motives in his violin sonatas of his cello solo suites.
His approach deeply influenced pianists like Keith Jarrett and Brad Mehldau, that focus their playing as well on following motivic and melodic ideas even if that means that for longer periods in a solo it means that they are playing outside the changes.
Just as an anecdote: I hired Paul Bley in 1993 to play in my hometown ( Wittlich, Germany)
with Jimmy Giuffre and it was great to observe this very unconventional and free way to improvise melodic lines over well known standards.
"A big change in harmonic usage in jazz occurred in the early 1960's when a handful of musicians, some of them on piano, started bringing the use of polytonality into the music---not as an occasional garnish or an arranging tool, but as an integral, structural part of the music's improvisational sound. Paul Bley, Herbie Hancock, McCoy Tyner, and Keith Jarrett were some of the best-known pianists involved in this movement; Bley may well have been the first.
Not as well known was Bley's effort to help younger musicians. He would sometimes take a younger pianist whose work he liked---and this includes me---to breakfast at 3 a.m., and explain how he dealt with the business side of the music. In my case, at least, I can vouch for the fact that Bley's coaching session could be kind of life-changing.
Paul Bley's solo on Sonny Rollins' "All The Things You Are", with Coleman Hawkins (Sonny Meets Hawk, RCA) was basically a career - maker for Paul. ...the gig with Sonny Rollins was one of the last he would do as a sideman before devoting himself primarily to his own trios in the mid-sixties.
In this solo, he stretches harmony to the breaking point, something that he began doing even before his work with Ornette Coleman five years before. By the time this solo was recorded, Paul had reached a point of maturity with these ideas, that is, finding "landing spots" harmonically, so that he could play where the harmony was GOING, rather than the chord changes at hand, disregarding, ignoring, or playing THROUGH the changes (to fool the listener) to a point of resolution, where the listener would realize that he actually WAS in the right place in the song. It's all about tension and release, where spontaneous melody takes precedence over the original harmony of the tune. Often, Paul would play against the harmony of a phrase until the last bar or two, at which point he would briefly "land" before "taking off" as the next phrase began.
As iconoclastic as Paul seemed on the surface, many of his improvised compositions were actually based on templates of standards - that is, the basic form of the tune (which could be changed - Paul thought the AABA form contains too many A's, so he often played AABABABA), constantly reharmonized, without any direct reference to the original melody. Bley loved the Great American Songbook, and his most frequent references were "I Can't Get Started", "Isn't It Romantic?", "Lover Man", "All The Things You Are", and "Don't Explain" - there are many examples in his discography, and he gives hints with his titles - "Started", "It Isn't", "Lovers", are the most obvious examples of titles listed above, and there are many other examples with less obvious hints. That's part of the joy of listening to Paul Bley - you never know where his improvisations are coming from, but sometimes things sound awfully familiar, and figuring that out is part of Paul's sound of surprise
"Paul Bley has long been a hero of mine for reasons that are beautifully illustrated on this particular side. The first thing to be noted, though, is the Space Age solo Hawk takes, showing that nothing but original thought will work here, that poseurs need not apply.
Paul's solo is startling, in that, if heard on a simplistic level, it may seem"out". But, what I hear is someone who respects and 'plays with' the harmonic framework of the tune while making phrasing and dynamics choices that set him apart. It's that combination of fearless exploration rooted in tradition that first attracted me to Paul's playing - and that of Sonny and Hawk, too, for that matter." Roberto Magris:
"Bley's solo is amazing to me because I can immediately recognize that it's Paul Bley. and there are not so many pianists that you can immediately recognize while playing "All The Things You Are.". I like him and especially this solo because he always take risks, he tries to find troubles and unconventional phrasings, even (or especially) when the chord progression is obvious, as in that standard. He seems not to play "All The Things You Are" but "on" "All The Things You Are" and he improvises on that song as a whole .instead of improvising on a fragment or on a specific chord progression. He seems to keep in mind the whole song.
In this solo I can hear several of his favorite patterns and it's quite paradigmatic for his style. I'd like to point out that he has no influences from Tyner/Hancock/Evans in his playing, but he comes from bebop straight to the avant-garde. His approach is much more advanced than Hawk (of course) and Sonny since he plays freely and (does) not follow exactly the chord progression. He's at the most within the tonality (as Ornette?). It's a great solo by a great musician who stands out together with Tyner, Hancock & Taylor as a master of modern/contemporary jazz piano."
Paul Bley, in his early playing (pre; New York), was a clone of Oscar Peterson's ... Lots of fast right hand "cooking" improvised melodies and coordinated left hand chord comping which enforced and supported the right hand.
When I first listened to him in his post NYC phase, I found him more probing harmonically and melodically. He was beginning to create an original style. He recorded profusely and he told me he believed that his legacy lie there, in the recordings. He also felt that recording with different players enhanced his pianistic abilities to fit inside any playing/accompanying situation. Carla Bley also greatly influenced him musically through her compositions. He encouraged her to compose more and more.
Paul always looked forward never backward in his improvising. One can definitely hear where Keith Jarrett was very,very influenced by Bley's improvising and pianistic abilities, in terms of his counterpoint lines.
Paul was truly an original. I am saddened by his passing.
" "All the Things You Are" is a masterful example of Bley weaving melodic constructs that imply shifting tonalities. These tonalities create varying degrees of tension with the original set of chord changes. This ability to pivot between tonal centers and hear them in relation to the fixed harmonies of a standard tune create an amazingly and unique melodic vision that realizes his goal of communicating one's personality to the listener. Since many of his ideas are major scale based, this also fits with his thoughts about using the 'vivid character of the written composition.' "All the Things You Are"', in spite it's many chord changes, spends much of it's time outlining only a few major keys."
"It's funny how famous that solo is. That was exactly the song I was going to talk about and exactly the solo. Harmonically it was just flat out some new stuff, an obtuse approach that had never been tried before. You can hear traces of it in Keith Jarrett and many great pianists that followed. I myself am extremely influenced by a few of his solos, "All the Things You Are" in particular. I think it informed my harmony and it still does today."
"I didn't read Pat's specific comments on Paul's solo, but I agree with him that it is special. There is a relaxed intensity throughout, and excellent groove. He is telling a story--commenting on what went before and soon pushing into very new harmonic territory, farther and farther out, but occasionally referencing the basic structure, to make what he is doing pull more deliciously against it. The unusual shapes of his phrases and displacements add greatly to the total experience. And his solo galvanizess Sonny into some of his most unusual and far-out playing.
Paul was pushing the envelope from the start, and always had his own thing, throughout the many decades of his career. I'll always remember how gracious he and Carla were in inviting me to sit in when I was a musically unknown medical student visiting New York in 1963."
Conclusion:
After reading their responses it becomes obvious that Mr. Bley's music was a game changer for many. I am sure countless others were radically affected by this solo and by Bley's music in general. He was a trailblazer whose restless spirit led him on an uncompromising path throughout his over fifty years of performing. After he acquired a thorough understanding and mastery of where the music came from, it was his solo on " All the Things You Are" from 1963 that was his way of leading us all into a new direction. As Metheny said so succinctly it truly was "the shot heard 'round the world."